Jurors at the Britney Spears driving-without-a-valid-California-license, who were supposed to give the popstar the final verdict on the case yesterday, said they were unable to reach it.

‘I’m going to ask you to make another attempt to resolve whatever differences you have’, said Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James Steele.

Jurors, who began deliberations Friday, resumed their discussions but twice sent notes to the judge saying they were deadlocked. Questioned by the judge after a third note, the foreman said the panel was split 10 to 2. He was instructed not to reveal whether the majority favored conviction or acquittal.

With each return to the jury room, the foreman told the judge, “everyone has become more entrenched.”

But after several panelists said they thought reaching a verdict was still possible, the judge told them to continue deliberating. They later asked to review a transcript of the testimony of Spears’ father, Jamie, the sole defense witness.

Spears, 26, did not attend the trial. She faces a maximum of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine if convicted of the misdemeanor.

During the trial, an attorney for Spears argued that she was not required to carry a California license because she considers her native Louisiana her true home and held a valid Bayou State license at the time of the accident.

• Britney Spears Driving License Case gets dropped — declared as Mistrial
• Jurors deciding verdict on Britney Spears driving license case today
• Britney Spears Driving License Case to Resume on Monday
• Judge refuses to dismiss Britney Spears’ driving license charge
• Judge to decide restraining order in Britney Spears against Sam Lufti case